Food Stamp Dependency, Riots Leads to Martial Law

Food Stamp Dependency, Riots Leads to Martial Law - infowars.com:

"By encouraging mass dependency on the welfare state, the Obama administration is ensuring that nationwide rioting due to a large-scale collapse of the food stamp program will “justify” an explosive expansion of the police state. Under pressure from above and pressure from below, the American people will be in serious danger of losing their rights and what remains of the republic. The administration’s goal to dramatically increase food stamp enrollment, officially known as the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP), follows a strategy called pressure from above and below, in which the government deliberately creates problems in order to offer “solutions” which only expand government powers at the expense of individual rights. The government’s “solution” to nationwide rioting due to a crash in the food stamp system will no doubt involve a federalized police state takeover, perhaps even martial law, with Department of Homeland Security tanks and VIPR squads roaming America’s streets to supposedly “restore order” out of the chaos while ignoring the Bill of Rights with impunity."
  
Quotes from U.S. traitors supporting a one world government:

"Today America would be outraged if UN troops entered Los Angeles to restore order. Tomorrow they will be grateful. When presented with this scenario, individual rights will be willingly relinquished for the guarantee of their well being granted to them by their world government." - Henry Kissinger (Source)

"We are grateful to the Washington Post, The New York Times, Time Magazine, and their great publications whose directors have attended our meetings and respected their promises of discretion for almost forty years. It would have been impossible for us to develop our plan for the world if we had been subjected to the lights of publicity during those years. But, the world is now more sophisticated and prepared to march toward a world government. The supra-national sovereignty of an intellectual elite and world bankers is surely preferable to the national auto-determination practiced in past centuries." - David Rockefeller (Source)

"The drive of the Rockefellers and their allies is to create a one world government combining super capitalism and communism under the same tent, all under their control. Do I mean a conspiracy? Yes, I do. I am convinced there is such a plot, international in scope, generations old in planning, incredibly evil in intent." - Rep. Larry MacDonald, killed in Korean Air Lines 007, 1983 (source)

We shall have World Government, whether or not we like it. The only question is whether the World Government will be achieved through consent or conquest." - Paul Warburg, author of Federal Reserve Act (Source)


The real truth of the matter is, as you and I know, that a financial element, in the larger centers has owned the government since the days of Andrew Jackson." - Franklin D. Roosevelt in letter to Colonel House, 1933 (Source)

"It seams to many of us, that if we are to avoid the eventual catastrophic world conflict, we must strengthen the United Nations as a first step toward a world government patterned after our own government with a legislature, executive and judiciary, and police to enforce its international laws and keep the peace. To do that, of course, we Americans will have to yield up some of our sovereignty. That would be a bitter pill. It would take a lot of courage, a lot of faith in the new world order. Pat Robertson has written in a book a few years ago that we should have a world government but only when the Messiah arrives. He wrote, literally, any attempt to achieve world order before that time must be the work of the devil. Well, join me. I'm glad to sit here at the right hand of Satan." - Walter Cronkite (Source)

Recommended gospel sermon and gospel hymns:

When Government Tries to Be God, by Dr. David P. Murray

Please Search the Book Again, Mckenzie George & Bruce Willey
How Deep the Father's Love For Us, Sung by Joy Williams

How To Fix America In 10 Easy Steps!

Do you like 'How To Books?' Then you'll love this new article in Human Events!  I loved it.

How to Fix America in 10 Easy Steps, by Tom Edmunds

If I were the one writing this article, however, I would add one more crucial Step:

First get rid of the globalist elite who are conspiring to destroy America in favor of a one world government under the United Nations!

See my post:

Enemies of the State: 45 Goals of the Communist Party, USA, in 1963

Henry Kissinger Predicts Nuclear War With Iran

Kissinger Predicts Nuclear War With Iran - Infowars.com

Excerpt:

"Globalist kingpin, renowned war criminal and Rockefeller co-conspirator Henry Kissinger is talking up a nuclear conflagration. Speaking at the one-worlder confab held in Davos, Switzerland, Kissinger said a crisis involving a nuclear Iran in the 'foreseeable future' will lead to a nuclear war and “a turning point in human history,” the BBC reports.

There are some people who believe 9/11 was the result of a government conspiracy. I'm not necessarily one of them. But I do know that there were wealthy and powerful people in America - both Republicans and Democrats - that wanted something like 9/11 to occur, so they could use it to scare  Americans into going along with legislation like the Patriot Act.

And there are people today that believe the Sandy Hook Massacre was the result of a government conspiracy. Again, I am not necessarily one of them. But there is no doubt that Obama is pushing to totally disarm Americans, and when a horrendous crime like Sandy Hook occurs, he is quick to exploit it to further his agenda.

And so when I read that Henry Kissinger is predicting nuclear war with Iran, I take it serious. First, it is utterly amazing that the world has not had some form of limited nuclear war since Democratic President Harry Truman dropped the bomb on Japan in 1945, killing hundreds of thousands of men, women and children - mostly civilians!

But the world is only a hairs breath right now from accepting a one world government, and those, like Henry Kissinger who have devoted their lives to this cause, know that all it would take to scare the world into accepting this would be to have a limited nuclear war.

Consider Mr. Kissingers comment made in 1992:

"Today Americans would be outraged if UN troops entered Los Angeles to restore order; tomorrow they will be grateful. This is especially true if they were told that there was an outside threat from beyond, whether real or promulgated, that threatened our very existence. It is then that all peoples of the world will plead with world rulers to deliver them from this evil. The one thing every man fears is the unknown. When presented with this scenario, individual rights will be willingly relinquished for the guarantee of their well being
guaranteed by their world government." (Source)

Before the UN can (safely!) send in troops to any American town or city, their servant, Mr. Obama, has to destroy the Second Amendment and take away our guns!  When that happens - not if, but when - I predict that the UN will begin to show its teeth.

Recommended reading (my post):

Why I believe in the Conspiratorial Theory of History
Is Obama the Antichrist? I Say Yes!
The Things Which Must Soon Come to Past

The United Nations is Going to Pry Your Guns from Your Cold Dead Hands!

Foreign Troops to Confiscate American Guns Under UN Treaty

Former Secretary of State, Henry Kissinger, has been quoted as saying:

"Today Americans would be outraged if U.N. Troops entered Los Angeles to restore order; tomorrow they will be grateful! This is especially true if they were told there was an outside threat from beyond, whether real or promulgated, that threatened our very existence. It is then that all peoples of the world will plead with world leaders to deliver them from this evil. The one thing every man fears is the unknown. When presented with this scenario, individual rights will be willingly relinquished for the guarantee of their well being granted to them by their world government." In an address to the Bilderberger organization meeting at Evian, France, on May 21, 1991. As transcribed from a tape recording made by one of the Swiss delegates.

National Defense Resource Preparedness Executive Order

My mind was probably permanently warped by my high school business law teacher - he taught me how to read books and newspapers with a critical (some might say cynical) eye.  One thing that he said that has really stuck in the back of my mind was "Beware of FEMA." That was in the mid 1970s. He was an older gentleman, and I would assume he retired long ago. But he said that FEMA had the authority in times of crisis to usurp the powers of the presidency.

With that as the background for this post, I want to talk about an Executive Order that was signed March 16, 2012 by President Obama.  The executive order is called National defense resources reparedness. While many say it is just routine government business - just preparing for the worst case scenarios - others see it as establishing peace time martial law - right now! Consider this paragraph from Obama Executive Order: Peacetime Martial Law:

"Under this order the heads of these cabinet level positions: Agriculture, Energy, Health and Human Services, Transportation, Defense and Commerce can take food, livestock, fertilizer, farm equipment, all forms of energy, water resources, all forms of civil transportation (meaning any vehicles, boats, planes), and any other materials, including construction materials from wherever they are available. This is probably why the government has been visiting farms with GPS devices, so they know exactly where to go when they need  when they turn this on."

This should make any true American stop and think, especially when you read it in light of the United Nations Agenda 21, which wants to take an 'inventory' of the entire world, including all of the above things in America that this Executive Order gives the president power to confiscate.

I said in a previous post (Render to Obama) that I did not think America would have a peaceful transfer of power this fall.  What I meant was that either President Obama would be reelected, or that he would do something like declare martial law and suspend the elections - something that has been very popular in other countries the past century.

Then I back peddled, and wrote another post (Is the Left throwing Obama Under the Bus?), and said that yes, maybe Obama is going to be voted out of office and Mr. Romney will move into the White House next January - without a shot being fired (A novel concept in many parts of the world!).

Now I think it could go either way - both of which sends shivers down my spine. If Gary Allen is correct (see my posts on None Dare Call it Conspiracy), and that for the past 50 years or so both Democrat and Republican presidents have been controlled by a 'secret government' bent on surrendering America's sovereignty to an all powerful United Nations, then it really doesn't matter who wins in November. America still loses.

It may be that the 'secret government' has already decided that Romney is going to be elected this fall. In that case, they could get Obama to pass a whole lot more 'Executive Orders,' like the National defense resources preparedness, before he gets out.

Americans will think they have rid themselves of an evil dictator, and not even realize that all of the executive orders - orders which strengthen the powers of the president - will be handed off to Mitt Romney.

The late Calvinist Minister and philosopher Dr. Francis Schaffer once said, "The danger in regard to the rise of authoritarian government is that Christians will be still as long as their own religious activities, evangelism, and lifestyles are not disturbed." (How then shall we live?)

America's Death Rattle

Today is Thanksgiving - at least in America. I am a patriot and I love my country. I'm not ashamed to say I am a conservative Republican although I really don't think there is much difference between the two parties. My ancestors came over from Norway and Sweden over 100 years ago, but I consider myself a 'spiritual' descendant of the Puritans.

One of the benefits of being in prison (and there are many) is you get to know people from a wide range of backgrounds. I've made friends with Native Americans whose ancestors occupied this country for thousands of years before Columbus 'discovered it.' I've made friends with African Americans who were the direct descendants of slaves. And I've gotten to know many men from Mexico who are firmly convinced that America stole their country - or at least a large portion of it in the Southwestern states.

I empathize with them, but at the same time there is no doubt in my mind that if America did not exist, especially in the last century, the world as we know it today would be radically different, and not for the better.

If there were not an America that was willing to fight in World War I and World War II, we would all be speaking German today (especially France!).

If America did not get involved in the Vietnam war/conflict, the so called 'Domino Theory' may well have come true and today we would be fighting a communist Canada on the North and a communist Mexico on the South.

And if we never had a Ronald Regan who was willing to stand up to the Soviet Union in the 1980s, God only knows where the world would be today. No doubt Al Gore would have still invented the Internet (!!) but it would only have one link, and that would take you to Soviet-Empire.com.

I used to work in a hospital where I cared for many patients who were on their death bed. There is a sound that people make when they are about to die - some call it a death rattle. I can hear the death rattle coming out of America's throat and I know that the time is near.

What is a Socialist?

An article in the New York Times, What’s a Socialist?,  asks the question "And what does it mean to be a Socialist these days, anyway?"  The article goes on to say:

"Not very much. Certainly nothing radical. In a sense, socialism was an ideology of the industrialized 19th century, a democratic Marxism, and it succeeded, even in (shh!) the United States. Socialism meant the emancipation of the working class and its transformation into the middle class; it championed social justice and a progressive tax system, and in that sense has largely done its job."

I would expect nothing less than this kind of description of Socialism from the New York Time.  But let's take another look at socialism, from a 'slightly' different point of view.  The point of view I'm refering to is found in Gary Allen's book, None Dare Call it Conspiracy, published in 1971.

The following quotes come from Chapter Two of None Dare Call it Conspiracy, which is titled: Socialism - Royal Road to Power for the Super Rich:

"Socialism is a philosophy which conspirators exploit, but in which only the naive believe. Just how finance capitalism is used as the anvil and Communism as the hammer to conquer the world will be explained in this book."

"In keeping with the fact that almost everybody seems to have his own definition of Communism, we are going to give you ours, and then we will attempt to prove to you that it is the only valid one. Communism: AN INTERNATIONAL, CONSPIRATORIAL DRIVE FOR POWER ON THE PART OF MEN IN HIGH PLACES WILLING TO USE ANY MEANS TO BRING ABOUT THEIR DESIRED AIM-GLOBAL CONQUEST."

"Unless we understand the conspiratorial nature of Communism, we don't understand it at all. We will be eternally fixated at the Gus Hall level of Communism. And that's not where it's at, baby!"

"The drive to establish SOCIALISM, not Communism, is at the core of everything the Communists and the Insiders do. Marx and all of his successors in the Communist movement have ordered their followers to work on building SOCIALISM. If you go to hear an official Communist speaker, he never mentions Communism. He will speak only of the struggle to complete the socialization of America. If you go to a Communist bookstore you will find that all of their literature pushes this theme. It does not call for the establishment of Communism, but SOCIALISM."

"Walter Trohan, columnist emeritus for the Chicago Tribune and one of America's outstanding political commentators, has accurately noted:

"It is a known fact that the policies of the government today, whether Republican or Democratic, are closer to the 1932 platform of the Communist Party than they are to either of their own party platforms in that critical year."

"And Mr. Trohan has also been led to believe that the trend is inevitable:

"Conservatives should be realistic enough to recognize that this country is going deeper into socialism and will see expansion of federal power, whether Republicans or Democrats are in power. The only comfort they may have is that the pace will be slower under Richard M. Nixon than it might have been under Hubert H. Humphrey…"

"Since all Communists and their Insider bosses are waging a constant struggle for SOCIALISM, let us define that term. Socialism is usually defined as government ownership and/or control over the basic means of production and distribution of goods and services. When analyzed this means government control over everything, including you. All controls are 'people' controls. If the government controls these areas it can eventually do just exactly as Marx set out to do - destroy the right to private property, eliminate the family and wipe out  religion."

"If one understands that socialism is not a share-the Wealth program, but is in reality a method to consolidate and control the wealth, then the seeming paradox of super-rich men promoting socialism becomes no paradox at all. Instead it becomes the logical, even the perfect tool of power-seeking megalomaniacs. Communism, or more accurately, socialism, is not a movement of the downtrodden masses, but of the economic elite. The plan of the conspirator Insiders then is to socialize the United States, not to Communize it."

____________________________

Recommended reading

None Dare Call it Conspiracy, by Gary Allen

Tragedy and Hope - A History of the World in our Time, by Dr. Carroll Quigley

The Naked Capitalist, by W. Cleon Skousen

Why I Believe in the Conspiratorial Theory of History

For those of you not up to speed on the Conspiratorial Theory of History, let me refer you to Gary Allen's book None Dare Call it Conspiracy (published in 1971), or better yet, watch it on YouTube.

The Conspiratorial Theory of History is not synonymous with conservative right wing politics (e.k.a. Sean Hannity, Rush Limbaugh, Mark Levin, Bill O'reilly and Ann Coulter). I suspect that many people who identify themselves as conservative also believe much of the same things that those who hold to the Conspiratorial Theory of History believe, but they won't admit it for fear of being called the 'C' Word (No, not that C Word, the other one, a conspiracy nut!).

One of the key principles of the Conspiratorial Theory of History is the belief that the differences between conservatives and liberals, between Democrats and Republicans, are meaningless.  The people who really hold the power in America don't care if the White House is occupied by a Democrat or a Republican. Either way, they are the ones pulling the strings and their purpose (surrendering America's sovereignty to an all powerful (and godless!) United Nations is going to move forward. See Romney Should Run as Obama's Vice President - He is a Democrat, After All.

What really sets those who believe in the Conspiratorial Theory of History apart from those who just want to be identified as 'conservative,' is the former believe America is in the predicament it is in today because for over 100 years rich and powerful men have been actively planning on America's destruction and setting up the United Nations as an all powerful One World Government.

The liberal press would mock at that last statement, pointing out that the United Nations has only been in existence since 1945. And yet, the father of the U.N. is the League of Nations (founded just after World War I came to a close) and the Federal Reserve Monster (I mean System!) has been in existence for just short of 100 years (See Secrets of the Federal Reserve, by Eustace Mullins).

This is what I believe, but I admit that I could be wrong. Maybe America is going to be destroyed (financially and morally, if not literally!) and be just one of 196 countries around the globe, all of which have one vote in the new world government (a.k.a., the United Nations). And if the rest of the world votes that Christianity is no longer a legal religion, well, then it is no longer a legal religion.

At that point it won't matter whether America's demise was the result of the planning and calculations (and yes, conspiracy!) of a group of very rich and powerful men. Or whether it came about by accident. The results are going to be the same.

I want to conclude this post with a quote from Reformed Calvinist theologian and philosopher, Dr. Francis Schaeffer:

"The central message of biblical Christianity is the possibility of men and women approaching God through the work of Christ. But the message also has secondary results, among them the unusual and wide freedoms which biblical Christianity gave to countries where it supplied the consensus. When these freedoms are separated from the Christian base, however, they become a force of destruction leading to chaos.

"When this happens, as it has today, then, to quote Eric Hoffer (1902-1983), 'When freedom destroys order, the yearning for order will destroy freedom.'

"At that point the words left or right will make no difference. They are only two roads to the same end. There is no difference between an authoritarian government from the right or the left: the results are the same. An elite, authoritarianism as such, will gradually force form on society so that it will not go on to chaos.

"And most people will accept it - from the desire for personal peace and affluence, from apathy, and from the yearning for order to assure the functioning of some political system, business, and the affairs of daily life. That is just what Rome did with Caesar Augustus."